Fera ceased existing long before she died ([info]fera_festiva) wrote,
@ 2007-12-10 19:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: cold
Current music:Rancid - Django
Entry tags:deathly hallows uberwank

Deathly Hallows uberwank: Chapter 20, Xenophilius Lovegood
Once again, sorry for the delay on this. I will be completely honest: this chapter, and the seven million or so chapters that follow it, are massively dull, and motivating myself to fanwank about them is at times difficult. Blame JKR.



You'll remember that at the end of the last chapter, Ron returned to his position as Potter Sidekick Number One. Hermione is still pissed off at him, so he acts all remorseful and stuff, except when she's not there, when he is cheerful. These times tend to be when he and Harry are foraging for mushrooms and blackberries (in late winter. Yeah) and other edible items. I know I keep saying this, but it is really stupid that they aren't stealing their food. They have the ability to turn invisible AND the ability to teleport, two of the coolest abilities it's possible to have. (Man, if I had those abilities, I'd do nothing but shoplift. And then become more and more bored as the novelty wore off, and eventually die unloved and alone surrounded by a heap of gold, gourmet food and electronics.) And they're still wasting time looking for nonexistent mushrooms and crap. Forget what I said in the comments of the last chapter: I hate these kids.

They spend the first couple of pages giving each other updates on what's been going on. Ron explains that the word "Voldemort" has a taboo spell on it, so if you say it, you can be found instantly. REMEMBER BACK IN CHAPTER NINE WHEN THEY GOT FOUND IN THE CANTINA BY THOSE DEATH EATERS? THAT'S HOW THEY FOUND THEM! DO YOU GET IT? DO YOU WANT ME TO EXPLAIN IT AGAIN???

Actually, here I am acting like it was totally obvious, when it really wasn't. I swing between thinking the taboo thing is totally lame and thinking it's quite well-done. On the one hand, we saw it used earlier in the book in a way that now makes sense. However, like many of the plot devices that show up in this book, it feels a bit tacked-on. I mean, if this taboo thing was possible, why didn't Voldemort taboo his own name back in book one? And then as soon as someone whispers to Harry the name of the man who killed his parents - BAM Voldemort shows up and AKs the fuck out of Harry. OK, that would make for a rubbish seven-book series (at the start of every volume, instead of "Harry Potter was a wizard!" it would say "Harry Potter was still dead!") but I would argue that it's JKR's job as an author to show me why it didn't happen - and, of course, why fake-Moody didn't turn Harry's toothbrush into a portkey at the start of book four or, hell, just abduct him after class one day, and why Dumbledore didn't just tell Harry the truth about anything (and, of course, why those people on that island didn't just eat Gilligan).

In any case, if Voldemort really wanted to use the taboo to catch Harry, it's arguable his own name wasn't necessarily the best word to use. A good one would be "Horcrux", since - going by previous evidence, not that that's a foolproof method of deduction where these books are concerned, but I digress - very few wizards know about horcruxes at all, and Voldemort hasn't even told his most trusted lieutenants about his.

I wonder how the taboo works, anyway? I've just realised I've been working on the assumption that it works like a search engine. So tabooing the word "Harry" wouldn't be any good, because you'd get a "result", as it were, every time someone said it - and there are probably other people called Harry. "Harry Potter" might not be much more useful, because the name is probably being said by many people regardless of the side they're on (especially considering he's "Undesirable number one" and everything). But maybe it doesn't work like that. Maybe it's more like... a wizard did it, all right?

I don't know - maybe the taboo isn't specifically about catching Harry, just about catching dissidents (i.e. those who disrespect Voldemort enough to use his name). In which case it's not a bad plan, I suppose.

Ugh. Anyway. So, Ron and Harry engage in lots of as-you-know-your-father-the-king, plus lots of wangst because Dumbledore is dead and maybe he could still be alive (well, except for the part where Harry witnessed him get AK'd and fall off a tower. Unless Dumbledore is Rasputin, I'd say he's probably dead). A few more pages of Harry wangsting about Dumbledore, and then about his broken wand and how the spare one he's somehow acquired sucks, and then a few paragraphs where Ron tries to magically tune a radio. Fuckin' hell.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Then Hermione tiptoes around for a bit before finally saying she wants to go and visit Xenophilius Lovegood. You remember. That one guy who is Luna's dad and is a scientologist or something. Harry is bemused. Hermione's rationale for visiting the mumbling freak is that funny triangular sign that is totally the sign of the deathly hallows, which we all know because we've read the book, but at this point in the story we're not supposed to know it yet. But it must be connected with these hallows because it's page 319 and they haven't been mentioned in the story yet. Plus the symbol connects Dumbledore and Godric's Hollow and Xeno, and he's the only possibility they haven't exhausted yet. Ron backs Hermione up, either because he's trying to get back into her pants or because he's trying to get into her pants in the first place; the text doesn't make this clear. Oh, and Ron mentions that they'll be able to see Luna but only as an afterthought. Harry can't be arsed but they go anyway, apparating to a hill the next day.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Oh, by the way, nobody, not even Ron (whose family live nearby) actually knows where the Lovegoods live, nor what their house looks like. Our intrepid trio stand on the hill, surveying the village for a while, and Ron mentions that it's strange to be close to home but not visiting. Hermione pwns him, assuming he was home for Christmas. He explains that he didn't go home, but instead went to Bill and Fleur's place - they weren't at the Burrow for Christmas either, because they wanted to spend their first Christmas as a married couple on their own. So... therefore... Ron assumed he'd be welcome? I can just picture the scene - Ron standing on the doorstep of Shell Cottage, explaining to Bill why he's there, oblivious to the fact that Bill is wearing only a hastily thrown on dressing gown, and Fleur is peering out from behind the bedroom door, wrapped in a sheet. Also, they both have messy hair. And Bill is going, "well, bro, you know you're always welcome, but... well, wouldn't you rather see Mum and Dad? It's just, not a great time... right now... and anyway, the spare room isn't even, uh, decorated..." and Ron's going, "I don't mind, mate! I can kip on the sofa!" And Bill is all, "Yeah, um, well, we were going to... um... look, Ron..." and Fleur is tutting and rolling her eyes in the background and saying, in her badly-transcribed French accent, "Bill, when are you coming back to bed?"

And so, Bill and Fleur's plan of using the Christmas holiday to have sex in every room of the cottage was scuppered.

Once Ron has told this delightful tale, our intrepid trio spend several hours walking. After these several hours, they haven't found Casa Lovegood, so then they decide to apparate a few miles north. Why didn't they just do that from the start? Morons. It doesn't matter, though, because they apparate pretty much to the house. They can tell it's the right house because it looks like a rook, and we discover that Hermione doesn't know that Ron's talking about the chess piece. She thinks he means the bird. And she's meant to be the cleverest witch of all time or something.

They approach the house and find it suitably decorated with weird and wacky paraphernalia, like... an owl. And some trees. Those crazy wizards, eh? Xenophilius answers the door and they con their way in. The house actually sounds kind of badass inside - the sort of place I intend to live when I am rich and mad. It is perfectly circular and has a spiral staircase. They head up to the next floor, which reminds Harry of "the Room of Requirement on the unforgettable occasion that it had transformed itself into a gigantic labyrinth comprised of centuries of hidden objects". Unforgettable, she says. That's JKR's way of gently reminding us of that occasion, on the grounds that it's going to be important later: telling us outright that it was "unforgettable". Jesus H.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Anyway, the house is full of bizarre executive toys and copies of the Weekly World News and books by L Ron Hubbard and pamphlets claiming the destruction of the Death Star was an inside job and some posters of aliens smoking joints with the hilarious caption "Take me to your dealer" (hey, this is set in the mid-1990s, after all). Also, some kind of classified animal product called an erumpent horn which Hermione tells us is highly explosive, which means it's going to explode in the next chapter. (That's a Chekhov's gun, JKR-style: if there's an erumpent horn on page 325, it'll explode by about page 326. If there's an erumpent horn in an earlier book, however, it'll either never be mentioned again, or else will save Harry from death by crushing by whistling colours at him.)

Xeno ums and ahs over helping Harry out, then finally says he will, if they'll just let him call Luna to come and see them first. While he's doing that, Harry gazes out of a window in the vague direction of the Burrow, and thinks about Ginny, in a way that I think is meant to be moving or emotive or something. It fails; more than anything it's reminiscent of that thing you do when you're 12 and have a massive crush on a celebrity and you sit around wondering what they're doing right now. When Xeno gets back, he shows them a wacky invention he's been inventing, a headband with fruit attached and stuff. He pours them a herbal tea each.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Finally, Xeno asks that twat Harry Potter what he wants help with. Harry mentions the symbol Xeno wore to the wedding, and Xeno ends the chapter on a cliffhanger by asking, all enigmatic-like, "Are you referring to the sign of the deathly hallows?" Duh-duh-duuuuuuuuh!!!!!

Well, that didn't take long, only 328 pages. In the next chapter, of course, we finally discover what the hallows are, and it's a total frigging anticlimax.

Previous Chapter | All Chapters | Next Chapter




(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]minnow_53
2007-12-10 09:28 pm UTC (link)
"Take me to your dealer"

Well, that pretty well finished me off... :D :D Perhaps because, at a time when I might have heard anything along those lines, my memory was being obliterated by weird substances.

I really like the illustrations and caption. Sort of deep, but in a funny and appropriate way: though the unicorn and clown dolphin thing is a bit disturbing. Much as this chapter is, because Xenophilius was so much a plot device that I couldn't take him seriously or see him in context as Luna's father. I'm really looking forward to seeing what you do with him in the next chapter. That one guy who is Luna's dad and is a scientologist or something. I really hope that's a clue! :) He'd make a shitty Mormon, that's for sure. And I don't mean to offend any Mormons reading this by that statement, btw.

With you on the shattered honeymoon at Shell Cottage. Honeymoon at Shell Cottage sounds like a romantic/detective novel, and I may write it now you've provided the inspiration, though it won't be anything anyone would want to read. :/ On the other hand, I thought the Voldemort's name things was pretty brilliant: and I suspect that JKR had that in mind all along, because it didn't sound contrived (IMO), unlike some of the other action.

I remain in thrall to your uberwank! Much love, as always. ♥ ♥ ♥

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-12-11 06:16 pm UTC (link)
I remember being about 14 and seeing those posters for sale in Plymouth market and just thinking they were the coolest thing ever. Bonus points if they had a) dolphins, b) Magic Eye, or c) the phrase "don't drink and drive, smoke a spliff and fly" on them. :D

I may write it now you've provided the inspiration, though it won't be anything anyone would want to read

I'd want to read it! Please write it, I'm certain your take on it would be badass. :P

I thought the Voldemort's name things was pretty brilliant: and I suspect that JKR had that in mind all along, because it didn't sound contrived

I actually really like the idea of it in principle, I just think the way it's presented is a bit meh. I love that after all Dumbledore and Harry's stuff about saying the name, it turns out you're better off not doing so; and I like what it implies about Voldemort (IMO), i.e. he's using it as a way to punish bravery and indirectly reward fear, which is another way he intimidates people. It's one of JKR's clever ideas and I almost get the feeling she was over it by the time she wrote it. :/

Thank you - and much love back! ♥

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]potterfreak0515
2007-12-10 10:10 pm UTC (link)
I think the reason Voldemort didn't use the taboo before is because he didn't have enough power - politically, that is. In the first war, he didn't control the whole Ministry. I think that probably has something to do with it. Like being able to moniter underage Apparition or something like that.

But I would like to know how the taboo actually works. I want to know the actual rules and parameters of magic. For instance, I still like to imagine that Transfigured objects have to revert back to their original form eventually because of the molecular structure and whatnot. But that doesn't seem to be the case in the Potterverse. Jo actually updated her site and said that magic wasn't an exact science, which disappoints me.

Oh, and do the Snatchers like sit around waiting for an alert that someone broke the taboo? Because the people that came down on the Trio were all part of the same group. How come there weren't a bunch of groups of Snatchers surrounding them?

(That's a Chekhov's gun, JKR-style: if there's an erumpent horn on page 325, it'll explode any minute. If there's an erumpent horn in an earlier book, however, it'll either never be mentioned again, or else will save Harry from death by crushing by whistling colours at him.)

Actually, I used to love how Jo had so many Chekhov's guns in the books. I remember writing down a list of them in class last year. But there was almost none in this book. There was the diadem and... I can't think of anything else. In my opinion, the third to fifth books were the best. I miss them.

Oh, and stealing. I think if Jo had put that in the book she'd have gotten too many angry parents pissed off at her. She's already encouraging witchcraft, homosexuality, cheating on schoolwork, and a bunch of other crap.

Can't wait for the next chapter!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-12-11 06:43 pm UTC (link)
he didn't have enough power - politically, that is

Interesting. I hadn't thought of it from that angle, but it makes sense - after all, he's more or less in hiding right up until the end of HBP, and it's not until this book that he - ahem - comes out, as it were. I suppose he didn't want to cast such a far-reaching spell with such massive effects while he was still undercover.

I want to know the actual rules and parameters of magic.

Yes, me too. It bothers me that magic isn't an "exact science", because... well, I'm not a scientist, but I'm aware that there are certain fundamental rules of physics that govern the way the world works. If there's some kind of magical force that can bypass them, I want to know how it does it - and simply saying "well, it's magic", to me, isn't a good enough explanation. I'm bothered by the idea that you can increase the quantity of food if it's just "magic", but not if the process involves drawing on trace elements in the air and altering their molecular structure or something. Or, how is it that you can transfigure a desk into a live pig but not conjure food from, say, rocks? Or would the pig eventually turn back, like you suggest? (Whereas something like an invisibility cloak woven from the hair of a... I forget, but it's in Fantastic Beasts - I can accept because it's possible that animal's hair has some physical property that reflects light or something.) Ugh, now I'm ranting.

In my opinion, the third to fifth books were the best. I miss them.

:( Agreed. I have been considering uberwanking other books after I finish this one, but I don't think I could bring myself to do PoA because I still love it. To me, that was the book where JKR was really developing her own "voice" in her writing, the plot was complex but not unwieldy, it was tightly knotted up, the characters were starting to develop... but the tone of it is still fresh and not like she's bored. (Plus it had time travel in it. I'm still a little disappointed the time turners just got handwaved away and we never saw them again.)

Sigh.

Oh well. Thanks for your lovely comment, anyway. :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]potterfreak0515
2007-12-12 02:53 am UTC (link)
I loved the time travel, too! In one of my Harry Potter theory books there's a whole section on time travel, and I just love it! I never get tired of reading those essays. Plus, PoA has lots of Remus/Sirius subtext!

Maybe you could uberwank HBP? Although I think half of those chapters really are too boring to write about.

And you brought up the invisibility cloak. Some things she write make sense. Like the fact that invisibility cloaks woven from the hair of a demiguise fade with time and eventually aren't transparent. But I don't think that was really her thinking it through; rather, it's her needing a plot device to make Harry's cloak special. But whatever. It just annoys me how she puts so little thought into these things. I once read an essay that mentioned how Jo's world was so much better than most other things (I think Doctor Who was the example the author gave) because of how well-thought out it was. But it sure as hell isn't anymore. Like the pig example you used: Why can't they slaughter the pig/desk? And if you can multiply food once you've got it, does that mean the Weasleys never need to buy food? Buy a small ice cream at Fortescue's and then multiply it so all her children can have one? I think food-multiplying spells should be illegal. Oh! And why didn't Hermione multiply whatever she stole from the store? Then they wouldn't be starving and looking for berries. But I digress.

Oh! The pig thing reminded me about how cruel animals are treated in HP. I remember an instance in book five were Hermione Vanished a kitten! What the hell happened to it? I think Neville was disembowling toads for detention once. And even though the mandrakes are plants, there's some really sick humour in that. Throughout the book Jo makes little references to remind us that they're there. "They had started growing acne and were trying to move into each other's pots" or something. And then they're cut up and stewed to make the Restorative Draught.

I suppose you could make the same argument for eating animals, but at least that serves a purpose! I fail to see why Vanishing kittens helps anyone.

Has anyone ever tried Vanishing Voldemort?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-12-12 11:38 am UTC (link)
Maybe you could uberwank HBP? Although I think half of those chapters really are too boring to write about

Haha. I have been considering it - I only ever read that book once, and I'd sort of like to read it again, but I don't want to admit that. Uberwanking it would be a good excuse, and I'd get to insert lots of ranting about Remus/Tonks and Harry/Ginny. :D

I remember an instance in book five were Hermione Vanished a kitten! What the hell happened to it?

Presumably it went wherever vanished objects go - that is, into everything (or whatever the line is... I don't have my book with me right now). Which is more than a little sinister. Because surely any sufficiently talented wizard/witch could just, as you say, vanish Voldemort and be done with it. Can you get vanished stuff back?

The animal thing is general is a little unsettling. I sometimes wonder about the rock that Cedric turns into a dog in the dragon task in GoF. To go from being a rock to a fully-grown dog facing a dragon in a matter of seconds would be pretty scary. How would the dog even know how to, well, be a dog? Argh! It makes my brain hurt. (There's actually a book by Philip Pullman that sort of discusses this - it's about a boy who used to be a rat until a fairy godmother turned him into a boy for Cinderella's carriage. It's really good.)

In short, yeah, everything you said. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]semielliptical
2007-12-11 01:21 am UTC (link)
That's a Chekhov's gun, JKR-style: if there's an erumpent horn on page 325, it'll explode any minute. If there's an erumpent horn in an earlier book, however, it'll either never be mentioned again, or else will save Harry from death by crushing by whistling colours at him.

Oh, god, yes. And I gave up trying to guess which things would turn out to be important a long time ago.

You deserve a prize for the Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world: pictures!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-12-11 06:56 pm UTC (link)
You deserve a prize for the Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world: pictures!

Thank you! This chapter is so boring in places I felt I had to liven it up. My only regret is that I initially forgot to include this:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

But I've remembered now, so no harm done. :D

Thank you so much for commenting. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ivakas
2007-12-15 02:54 pm UTC (link)
You know, the book would seriously improve if JKR put some gigantic sharks and evil unicorns of doom in it.

I was a bit disappointed by the moral "You must overcome your fear of the name" being updated "...and Lord Voldemort will come and kill you."
(shrug)OK, I admit that being brave does not pay off.

As for the Xenoguy. Before DH I thought he might be just pulling everyone´s leg in his tabloid. I imagined him as a man who just puts his fantasies on paper and in a way makes fun of everyone. Pity JKR wrote him just as an extrovert and occultist with no depth. Luna seems to have outgrown him mentally when she was nine.

And yes, if I was in trio´s position and I could make myself invisible and teleport wherever if wish, I would SO use it! Theft and havoc-wreaking ahoy!

Thanks for great review of yet another dull chapter.

You make DH interesting! And that´s something.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-12-15 08:48 pm UTC (link)
I was a bit disappointed by the moral "You must overcome your fear of the name" being updated "...and Lord Voldemort will come and kill you."
(shrug)OK, I admit that being brave does not pay off.


That's the thing, though - it doesn't pay off in real life, but the heroes of these books are Gryffindors. If being brave ultimately doesn't pay off then why should we care what happens to them, or root for them? I'm really torn on whether I like the message about being brave, mainly because it's a bit unclear whether Rowling thinks we should be or not. *Shrugs*

I imagined him as a man who just puts his fantasies on paper and in a way makes fun of everyone. Pity JKR wrote him just as an extrovert and occultist with no depth.

I hadn't thought of this but you're right, it's disappointing. He had the potential to be a little more interesting (or even a voice of scepticism, if he was written that way) but as it turns out he's just a weirdo.

Theft and havoc-wreaking ahoy!

Hahaha - hell yes! Actually, it's annoying that they didn't use those powers as opportunity to stir up support, given that Neville does all that rebellion stuff just through sheer balls.

Thank you so much for your comments - more soon, I promise, I just have to get my arse in gear. :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]pinkalarmclock
2009-01-14 03:48 am UTC (link)
Just been re-reading the whole Uber-Wank after reading DH - it's even funnier when I can remember the lines and things!

As to that thing about the chess!rook versus the bird!rook.....I was sort of expecting that to mean something. My english teacher drummed it into my head that you shouldn't describe things with fancy words, or add in a piece of dialogue, if it's neither important nor adds anything to the story, which means I tend to analyse every single word everywhere. JKR doesn't really say things unless it tells us something about the characters which this....just doesn't. So what exactly is the point?

Is it sad that that's been bothering me since the book came out? Quite probably. Off to read the rest. TTFN

Em xXx

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2009-01-14 01:40 pm UTC (link)
Aww, thank you! I'm really pleased my bitter ramblings are bringing you joy. XD

you shouldn't describe things with fancy words, or add in a piece of dialogue, if it's neither important nor adds anything to the story

Yep - I agree with that. There are reasons to include stuff: plot advancement, character development, rule of funny, there must be more. Sadly I think JKR does this too much, with the result that about half the things that later become important are disregarded, while at the same time readers find themselves assigning too much importance to things that are just completely throwaway (the Mark Evans debacle being an excellent example). Sigh...

Anyway, I hope you continue to enjoy re-reading!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nuclearsugars
2009-11-01 05:35 am UTC (link)
I think this is the most epic chapter yet of your uberwank.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2009-11-03 01:29 pm UTC (link)
Of course it's epic. IT HAS A SHARK. AND BEARS. XD XD XD

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…