Fera ceased existing long before she died ([info]fera_festiva) wrote,
@ 2007-11-17 11:47:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current music:Regina Spektor
Entry tags:deathly hallows uberwank

Deathly Hallows uberwank: Chapter 16, Godric's Hollow
Sorry this took so long to arrive. This chapter is both boring and overly sentimental, two qualities I abhore. Also, I recently discovered the Heroes graphic novel, in which (unlike here) interesting things happen to interesting characters.

Oh well.



Harry starts the chapter by waking up and immediately checking his flist for an update from Ron, before remembering that Ron deleted his journal last night. He and Hermione are sad. I feel this sends out a bad message to young fangirls or fanboys who might be wanting to delete their journals and leave the fandom, i.e. that anyone will give a shit.

Over the next few days, although it seems like aeons, they barely speak; Harry is reduced to staring at Ginny's dot on the Marauder's Map, watching it wandering about and feeling emo and sorry for himself. Man, you know things are bad when you're reduced to fwapping over a splot of ink. Well, it doesn't actually say he's fwapping, but he is. It's not like he's got anything else to do (and "reparo" doesn't work on GameCube controllers, so he doesn't even get to play Mario Kart! Ron's a bastard). Hermione is being emo for her own reasons, and not talking to him, so each of them sits in their own lack-of-a-Weasley induced fug, angsting and emoing and turning hopefully around whenever they catch a glimpse of anything orange out of the corner of their eye, but then retreating back into a deep depression when they realise it was just an old plastic bag caught in a tree.

I'm no Harmonian but in some ways I wish Harry and Hermione would at least dabble in screwing each other in these scenes, because it would at least be interesting. I can't think of anything more dull to read about than a pair of angsty teenagers sulking because they've each temporarily lost the resident annoying ginger kid in their lives.

This goes on for approximately ninety trillion years.

Or maybe like a couple of months. Either way, far too long. Harry and Hermione spend ages not doing anything and not saying anything and apparating about the place and occasionally talking to Phineas Nigellus. Harry even contemplates going back to Hogwarts until he remembers that a) he is "Undesirable Number One" and b) that would make him the world's biggest t00b. It gets colder, they camp in a bunch of places, they see Christmas decorations in windows and angst over those.

The "action" (ha!) of the chapter begins one night, when they are sitting around eating spaghetti bolognese (what, not stew?), made from ingredients Hermione took from a supermarket, dropping money into a cash register as she left. I can't even believe I'm going to be picky about this when there are people dying in wars and stuff, but here goes - Hermione's such a n00b for doing that. Look, I worked retail for years, and hated every minute of it, and every tiny detail that made it so sucky is as fresh in my memory as if it happened yesterday. And here's the thing - if you're a cashier, when you cash up at the end of your shift, your till is supposed to be dead on. If it's down (there's money missing), the default assumption is that you stole it. If it's up (extra money that shouldn't be there), the default assumption is that you short-changed someone, either by mistake or on purpose. Either way you get a bollocking.

What I'm saying is, if Hermione really wanted to be scrupulous, she should have just stolen the food. (That would have the added advantage of making her feel like some kind of anticapitalist revolutionary, which is an essential rite of passage for many middle-class British teenagers.) Of course, I have no reason to believe that the employee on that till was necessarily bollocked for this. It's just that, well, Hermione's being n00bish, and n00bishness pisses me off. Look, I'm in a filthy mood, all right.

Anyway, having not robbed a supermarket, they eat spaghetti bolognese and, uh, tinned pears. Man, in their position I'd be stealing, like, gourmet pizza and tiramisu and stuff. Hermione shows Harry her Beedle the Bard book, which has the deathly hallows symbol in it. He tells her it's the mark of Dumbledore's ex, which he knows because Viktor Krum told him. She reckons Grindelwald didn't have a mark. I despair. Months have gone by and this is as far as they've got. I see absolutely no reason for this, except that in a minute they decide to go to Godric's Hollow and, presumably to make things that little bit more sentimental and heart-wrenching and whatever, JK Rowling decided they needed to be there on Christmas Eve.

So, funnily enough, Harry decides to suggest to Hermione that they should go to Godric's Hollow, and funnily enough she agrees, although she wants to use the trip to look for the Master Sword of Gryffindor. Also, it transpires that Harry didn't know that Godric's Hollow was named after Godric Gryffindor, which really illustrates how much of a dumb fuck he is. I mean, OK, perhaps there have been loads of wizards called Godric, and we just haven't heard about them because they've only been mentioned off-page, in History of Magic class, or whatever. But what really gets me is that Harry seems massively surprised - like the idea that there might be a connection between GODRIC Gryffindor and GODRIC's Hollow never even occurred to him until Hermione said it. He's so stupid. Hermione even says so. Still - dumb fuck.

They talk about it a little more and then Hermione uses her jump-to-conclusions mat to decide that Bathilda Bagshot has the Lightsaber of Gryffindor and therefore they need to go and hang with her. Harry has the cheek to think she's being a bit stupid now, but doesn't say anything, not when going to Godric's Hollow is his "dearest wish" (well, right after boning Ginny, becoming a famous rapper, and killing Snape in a drive-by). They plan it all out, deciding to use both polyjuice and the cloaking device (that, right there, that's like the definition of "belt and braces"). Harry gets all sentimental and kind of nostalgic about going to Godric's Hollow, dribbling on about going "home", even though he has no memory of ever having been there. He goes on for a bit about how he should have grown up there and had brothers and sisters (including one sister, Ravenessa Starwitch, who has purple hair, marries Draco Malfoy and also has an affair with Legolas, and ends up saving the world), and had a birthday cake and stuff.

Anyway, having decided to go, they spend a week getting ready. This involves obtaining hairs from muggles in order to polyjuice up. Yes, you read that right - it takes them a week to find some hairs - oh, and for Hermione to stop being so paranoid as well. Eventually, off they go, apparating to the outskirts and walking in through the snow. (Hermione wants to walk under the cloak and magically hide their footprints. Harry reckons it isn't worth it, as they're in disguise and he wants to do ths properly, so they take off the cloak and walk normally. However, surely they are still leaving a trail of footprints that start in the middle of a patch of snow? Oh, whatever.)

In the village, there's a church and a pub and a war memorial. At least, it looks like a war memorial, but when you get close it's a statue of James and Lily and baby Harry. It's like one of those pictures of Jesus my grandfather had, where as you walk around the room the sacred heart looks like it's beating. You get the same kind of things in cereal sometimes, only there it's more likely to be a picture of Tony the Tiger doing something Stu-ish like slam-dunking a football while skateboarding.

Right, on with this. Seriously, you have no idea of the effort I'm having to put into this chapter. It's just so bloody boring and tedious and long - and this isn't even the most uneventful chapter in the book. Christ almighty. Right, come on. Harry and Hermione walk right past the pub, headed for the churchyard. (They are such total goths, it's unreal.) Coming from the church, they hear some carols. They figure out it must be Chriiiiiistmaaaaas. They look at graves. And OMG, it's Dumbledore's mum and sister. There's a quotation - well, it says it's a quotation, but it's really a bible verse (google offers, variously, Matthew 6:21, Luke 12:34 and something called the "Seven Steps To Financial Freedom". Hmm). It says, "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also". I don't really understand what that's getting at, so here's one of my favourite quotations, in lieu of an explanation:

HAN SOLO: Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.

- Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope

Naturally, the grave sets Harry off wangsting about Dumbledore, and how - me and Dumbledore, we're the same, you know, dude? - and all the same old bollocks. While he does this, Hermione continues to wander about; after a while, she finds a grave with the funny rune symbol/mark of Dumbledore's ex/deathly hallows symbol/cheapo triforce thing on it. (Remember that, it'll be on the exam.)

More searching, and eventually Hermione finds Lily and James. The bible quote on their grave is "You can't win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine". No, wait, I read that wrong. Really it's "the last enemy that shall be destroyed is death"; Hermione explains that it's to do with the afterlife. Look, I'm an atheist, all right. I have no energy to pull this apart, not least because that would be going way off topic. Whacking in multiple references to Star Wars and Zelda and Heroes is one thing, but segue-ing off into a debate over the very existence of God is so not what the Uberwank is for. So I'm just going to let you know that my lip is thoroughly curled at all this afterlife stuff, and I might re-read The God Delusion soon.

Harry takes little comfort in this, anyway, and has a good old cry. In a strange way I'm quite proud of him, for having believeable human emotions for once. Once he sorts himself out, he feels stupid for not bringing anything for the grave; Hermione conjures a wreath, they lay it on the grave. Harry's grief is such that he can't stay, and, arms around each other, they go. In many ways, it's really quite moving.

(On the other hand, while he hasn't done much crying specifically, Harry has been utterly rinsing the fact that his parents are dead for years. "Who wants the last cookie?" "Me! My parents are dead." "Whose turn is it to wash up?" "Not mine, my parents are dead." And so on. So, in conclusion, I am more or less indifferent to Harry's tears. Sorry. I do have a heart of ice, you know.)

Previous Chapter | All Chapters | Next Chapter


(29 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]spacefragments
2007-11-17 06:02 pm UTC (link)
(bah, I hate that I can't edit comments)

Also, it transpires that Harry didn't know that Godric's Hollow was named after Godric Gryffindor

*headdesks*
And so much for freakishgenius!Hermione. She's about as useless as Harry here.

"the last enemy that shall be destroyed is death"

It also sounds kinda Voldemort-ish IMO. I don't know.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-18 12:32 pm UTC (link)
And so much for freakishgenius!Hermione.

Totally. I've come to the conclusion that "genius" in wizarding terms roughly equals "average intelligence, possibly slightly lower" in muggle terms. They suck at everything.

It also sounds kinda Voldemort-ish IMO.

Yeah, it does. Come to think of it, there's probably a whole discussion to be had around Voldemort's fear of death/the afterlife/good vs evil/etc, if only I could be bothered to think about it...

(Reply to this) (Parent)

One thing, and one thing only.
[info]tough_as_petals
2007-11-18 12:23 am UTC (link)
Dawkins = win

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: One thing, and one thing only.
[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-18 12:39 pm UTC (link)
YES.

That is all.

:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-18 03:48 am UTC (link)
I've been thoroughly enjoying your dissection of this rotten book. Thank you for bothering, and please keep going!
What the hell did she think she was doing bringing the Bible into it? When has ANYONE in the Harry Potter books EVER been religious?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-18 01:21 pm UTC (link)
Thank you so much! Truth be told, if I weren't receiving so many lovely comments and so much good feedback I probably would have stopped a long time ago. :)

I was really surprised at the explicit bible stuff. I always liked and appreciated that in previous books, things seemed to be secular - neutral, if you like. (At least, most of the religious references, like the "Easter holidays" and godfathers and things, are just part of British culture and don't really have religious significance for many people any more.) The tone of the christian stuff in this one was much more... active? Explicit, anyway. It made me a little uncomfortable, to say the least. The stupid thing is, I was fine with the implications of an afterlife in OotP, say, because it didn't seem to be tied to any specific faith.

< /essay >

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-19 08:41 am UTC (link)
And it's weird, because religious persecution (the Burning Times etc) is one legitimate reason the wizards could give for isolating themselves from the rest of the world... despite the fact that if you ARE a real witch or wizard the Inquisition or Matthew Hopkins could do bugger-all to you...
in any case, it always seems as if they have isolated themselves from 'muggles' out of pure elitism, and I always found it too reminiscent of apartheid for comfort.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-19 02:02 pm UTC (link)
they have isolated themselves from 'muggles' out of pure elitism, and I always found it too reminiscent of apartheid for comfort

I'd never thought of it like that, but yes, that's an excellent point. They're claiming to be in hiding, for protection, but it's not like they need it. There's more than a whiff of the gated community about it, isn't there?

religious persecution (the Burning Times etc) is one legitimate reason the wizards could give for isolating themselves from the rest of the world...

I think this point is a good illustration of why, ultimately, JKR wasn't as clever with the world she created as she could've been. I have the impression that, having come up with the wizarding world as it is in the books, she didn't put enough thought into how it had got that way - what had influenced them to be in hiding and why certain laws existed and so on. Which would have been fine, actually, if she hadn't then decided that the wizarding world is Serious Business and started bringing in parallels to nazi Germany and the rest.

Hmm.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-20 04:01 am UTC (link)
I'd never thought of it like that, but yes, that's an excellent point. They're claiming to be in hiding, for protection, but it's not like they need it. There's more than a whiff of the gated community about it, isn't there?
I know I'm being pretty harsh here, but I have always found the word 'muggle' reminiscent of 'nigger.' Might be the aggressive double g in the middle, and the use of the word in a rather dehumanising way. I really, really dislike the way child readers of these books are encouraged to identify and sympathise with these elitist characters, and yet we're told that people like the Malfoys are the bad elitists. It's flipping hypocritical.
That and the capslock and chest monsters and all the rest of it.
Which would have been fine, actually, if she hadn't then decided that the wizarding world is Serious Business and started bringing in parallels to nazi Germany and the rest.
Precisely. If she had kept it on the sub-Enid Blyton level she started out with we would all have been a lot better off.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-20 07:05 pm UTC (link)
Yes, the "bad" elitists are the Malfoys et al, because they say "mudblood", which is a Bad Word. It's fine to judge an entire group of people based on inborn characteristics as long as you don't use an official Bad Word for it.

*eyeroll* and *headdesk*

There's a bit in one of the earlier books - I can't remember which off the top of my head - where Arthur meets Hermione's parents and squees at them - "Oh, you're muggles! Oh, how lovely!" and that sort of thing. It makes me cringe. And Arthur is supposed to be (and in some ways is) one of the most likeable characters - and the way he treats Hermione's parents is meant to be seen as sort of quirky and well-meaning, if a little clumsy. I grew up in a quite isolated town with few ethnic minorities etc, and I'm reminded of all the teachers, bosses and so on I knew who said things like, "Oh, there's no coloured people working here, but it doesn't mean we don't like them".

I don't by any means think JKR is an actual racist by any means, but I also don't think she's as clever/enlightened as she thinks she is - because the deeper implications of these sorts of things are dodgy. The fact that Harry, Ginny, and Hermione all date people of different ethnicities/nationalities but end up with other white (Gryffindor!) partners is another example, IMO.

Yeah. Serious Business indeed. *Despairs*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-21 11:30 pm UTC (link)
Yes, the "bad" elitists are the Malfoys et al, because they say "mudblood", which is a Bad Word. It's fine to judge an entire group of people based on inborn characteristics as long as you don't use an official Bad Word for it.

What makes me laugh is that 'muggle' is a much nastier-sounding word than 'mudblood.' Try saying them both in a low, hostile 'we don't want your kind in here' tone of voice. Having to enunciate the 'bl' straight after the 'd' slows you down and robs a lot of the impact.
I always wonder quite a lot about Hermione's family, and the contact she has with the normal world during her school holidays. It's easy for Harry to reject all that because he's been neglected and abused, but Hermione's loyalties should surely be more convincingly divided.
But no. Yay Hogwarts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-22 06:19 pm UTC (link)
Try saying them both in a low, hostile 'we don't want your kind in here' tone of voice

Yes, I take your point. In that context, "mudblood" sounds almost comical. A few years ago, someone showed me an old comic book about mutants (similar setup to X-Men - mutants were being discriminated against) that showed a bunch of non-mutants protesting, holding signs reading "Muties out". It was unintentionally hilarious, because it sounded like the kind of insult a five-year-old would use, alongside poo-poo-head et al.

Hermione's loyalties should surely be more convincingly divided

I've often wondered about that, too. In OotP, at one point she remarks that being a prefect is something her parents will understand and therefore be proud of, which I felt had the potential to be really quite poignant - but then she abandons a trip with them at Christmas to come to Grimmauld Place, and it isn't really explained beyond her not enjoying skiing very much. Another missed opportunity for JKR.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-23 12:00 am UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure 'muties' is used in [i]X-Men[/i] itself, at least in older issues - it always sounds like they've got a down on people who can't speak. Coming up with pretend racist insults is quite hard; every time Chief O'Brien referred to 'the bloody Cardies' in [i]Deep Space Nine[/i] I imagined knitwear and giggled.
I wonder if the writers of [i]Heroes[/i] will have to come up with an ugly name for their superhumans, general public for the use of, or if they'll sensibly avoid it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ivakas
2007-11-18 06:10 pm UTC (link)
Thanks so much for the review. Damn, so much better than the book itself (not that it would be much competition)!
I enjoy your comments so much. After reading DH I was planning a vendetta against JKR. I can´t believe the person who wrote the last two books is the same as the author of PoA. She either has split personality or she did not know what to do with the characters anymore. Especially with Remus.
I ended up screaming "fuck your would-be mysticism, give us actual story and character depth". Instead she stole the metaphysics from Chaucer and Donne (I guess), sword diving from Arthurian legends etc.
Harry not getting it that Godric Hollow is named after Gryffindor - faceplam. In the scene where Voldy kills him I actually thought FINALLY. Am I a bad fan? Harry is such a shitty protagonist. In last two books I thought about taking a pencil, writing myself into the book just to slap him and leave :-)
And yes, the camping chapters were boring me to tears.
All hail DH, the most frustrating book of all time (or at least several years)!
(Er, that is to say. I am a disappointed fan and you cheer me up X-)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-19 01:47 pm UTC (link)
Thank you! It's always nice to hear from anyone who's enjoying this. :)

She either has split personality or she did not know what to do with the characters anymore. Especially with Remus.

That's exactly the problem, IMO. She creates her characters for a very specific purpose (or, at least, she used to) and then insists on keeping them around despite not knowing what to do with them once they've fulfilled that. I think Remus is a very good example of this - his name basically gives away one of the twists in PoA. He's a symbol as much as a character. But then he sticks around, having done what he was supposed to do, so she starts making up random and pointless plot points for him. *cough*Tonks*cough*

In the scene where Voldy kills him I actually thought FINALLY. Am I a bad fan?

If a "bad fan" is someone who questions bad writing, implausible plot twists, dickhead protagonists, thinly-veiled steals from better works, a badly-explained system of magic, an author who can't seem to do basic maths... then yeah, you're a bad fan, but you're hardly alone in that. ;-)

Seriously, though, I don't think that does make anyone a bad fan. I think being a fan is, in a perverse way, a little like being in a relationship, in that it's probably healthier to see (and criticise, and look at ways to improve on) major flaws than to hero-worship. *Shrugs*

I am a disappointed fan and you cheer me up

I'm really pleased to hear that. That's made my day, actually. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]evil_underlord
2007-11-19 03:10 pm UTC (link)
What angered me the most was the war memorial. I mean, yeah, wizards think muggles are pretty lame and all, but to be so self centred and elitist as to magically change a war memorial remembering the hundreds who died in two world wars and make it instead about two rich bastards who'd bought up a cottage in the village so that they could escape the London rat race and live out their idyllic rural fantasies at the expense of the local housing market.

I get that the defeat of Voldy the first time was important even for muggles, but winners/losers are not what memorials are really about.

Gah. I don't know

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-19 06:17 pm UTC (link)
I hadn't thought of it like that but yeah - that's, well, tasteless-slash-mildly offensive, I guess. Like this one magic family outweights all those other people who died in actual world wars. And that's sort of the case no matter which way you look at it. :-/

two rich bastards who'd bought up a cottage in the village so that they could escape the London rat race and live out their idyllic rural fantasies at the expense of the local housing market

LOL! You see, now I'm imagining Godric's Hollow in the Guardian Weekend's "Let's move to..." section. I can just picture the article now...

LET'S MOVE TO... Godric's Hollow

What's going for it? Rising house prices; good rail links into London; shitcock; regular farmers' market; recently named the Guardian's top place to destroy next; organic butcher.
The case against Full of wiccans or whatever. I'm not prejudiced but they're going to ruin our chances of best kept village. Blah blah blah shitcock.
Bargain of the week Ruined cottage, invisible to muggles, but £20,000 should fix that and modernise fittings, £200,000.

Don't even get me started on Bill and Fleur's cottage on the Cornish coast...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]evil_underlord
2007-11-21 09:52 am UTC (link)
Schools: Local Primary rated 'good' by Ofsted. The state secondary is ok, but for parents pushy enough, and those willing to make the requisite lifestyle changes, there are strong community links to faith school Hogwarts - Ofsted give it a 'Poor' rating, but the exam results and sense of entitlement displayed by Alumni speaks for itself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-20 04:04 am UTC (link)
Good point!
I always hoped that at some point Hermione would turn into Lenin and lead a revolution against all this bullshit.
And instead we got 'no, house elves LIKE being enslaved, they don't know what to do with freedom.'

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

In Soviet Russia, statue replaces you (?)
[info]evil_underlord
2007-11-21 10:21 am UTC (link)
Word.

As much as she claims she's not writing genre fantasy she sure uses an awful lot of its tropes: the 'happy slave race' being just one of them.

And Lenmione sounds cool, but I can just imagine Ron basically being Stalin (to Harry's Trotsky? - or would it be the other way round) and bringing it all back and worse.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: In Soviet Russia, statue replaces you (?)
[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-21 11:22 am UTC (link)
You see, now I'm imagining a picture of Harry, Ron and Hermione surrounded by house-elves, and then a later picture where Ron has mysteriously disappeared and Harry and Hermione are standing closer together than they were in the original.

Which brings us to this macro.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: In Soviet Russia, statue replaces you (?)
[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-21 11:24 pm UTC (link)
OH WAIT.
Dumbledore is obviously Lenin, he's got the mausoleum. Hermione is Trotsky, Harry is Stalin, and Ron is... um...
I 'did' the Russian Revolutions at university, but obviously the full cast of characters didn't get written to long term memory.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: In Soviet Russia, statue replaces you (?)
[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-22 05:55 pm UTC (link)
Alternatively - if Dumbledore is Lenin, then maybe Grindelwald is Trotsky, and all that stuff about him being a maniac is lies spread by... um...

Look, I only got a D in history, all right? ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: In Soviet Russia, statue replaces you (?)
[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-22 11:49 pm UTC (link)
Except that JKR was so clearly trying to make Grindelwald out to be the wizard Hitler. Doesn't Dumbledore have awesome taste in his gayness? (Not that it gets her any brownie points with me - I would have thought it was brave if she put it in one of the books, but dropping it in an interview after the books are all published was a cop-out.)
Another weakness in the Potterverse: what about all the ordinary people who RECKON they're witches or wizards? Where does Aleister Crowley fit into all this?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]minnow_53
2007-11-22 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Oh, no, how did I miss this? *aghast* I've only just found it, as you posted the new one and I realised there was a chapter left out. My f-list has also been missing some remusxsirius entries, so I'm really annoyed now. Oh, well, at least I get a double feature! :D

Harry has been utterly rinsing the fact that his parents are dead for years. "Who wants the last cookie?" "Me! My parents are dead." "Whose turn is it to wash up?" "Not mine, my parents are dead."

Lol! That's very South Park; probably the highest compliment I can give. But I agree that the original of this chapter isn't the best and brightest. It felt as if JKR had superimposed the Godric's Hollow thing because she mentioned it HBP and couldn't get out of it. But the snake was good... And I'm now going to read what you make of Bathilda! :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-22 11:50 pm UTC (link)
Dead Bathilda being controlled by the snake was almost cool. It was very Lovecraftian.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-23 09:58 am UTC (link)
It was pretty Lovecraftian - except that if it was really Lovecraftian, then the entire chapter would have been taken up with description of how the thing coming at the end of the chapter was totally scary, so scary you'll simultaneously piss yourself and go mad, no, honestly, it's really really scary - and then, at the end of the chapter, it would either be so scary it couldn't be described in human language or else a total anticlimax. :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]air_and_angels
2007-11-23 10:08 am UTC (link)
I never find Lovecraft scary so much as deeply, deeply pleasurable to read because of the way he uses language. You just don't get people slinging around 'eldritch' and 'Cyclopean' the way he did (especially since he was using it to mean 'gigantic' rather than 'one-eyed,' which I'll admit took me a while to catch onto).
When I first saw Peter Jackson's King Kong and the wall of Skull Island came into view, I was so excited because that was exactly how I picture Cyclopean masonry. I'd love to see Peter Jackson adapt something by Lovecraft for film - although I think I've heard Guillermo del Toro is working on 'The Mountains of Madness,' and he's basically Mexican for Peter Jackson.
This reminds me that the first time I read 'The Mountains of Madness' I went around telling people 'That would be a great book, Harry Potter and the Mountains of Madness.'
I realise I need to stop now but you know interesting things would happen if Hermione came across a copy of the Necronomicon.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fera_festiva
2007-11-23 10:23 am UTC (link)
I posted this in the early hours of Saturday morning (well, half eleven, but that is early) so maybe it just slipped off the bottom of your flist or something. Or maybe LJ is just being a jerk, who knows.

That's very South Park

Thank you! That is such a compliment. And now I'm imagining Harry as a sort of emo Cartman. I might read all his dialogue in a Cartman voice from now, to make the book more entertaining for myself.

It felt as if JKR had superimposed the Godric's Hollow thing because she mentioned it HBP and couldn't get out of it

Oh yeah, totally. Their reasons for going are really tenuous, not to mention the weeks they spend essentially waiting for Christmas so they whole operation will be that much more speshul. And then once they get there, they do almost nothing and take two chapters to do it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(29 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…